Referate scoala
REFERATE Meniu
Referate Astronomie
Referate Biologie
Referate Chimie
Referate Diverse
Referate Drept
Referate Economie
Referate Engleza
Referate Filozofie
Referate Fizica
Referate Franceza
Referate Geografie
Referate Germana
Referate Informatica
Referate Istorie
Referate Italiana
Referate Marketing
Referate Matematica
Referate Medicina
Referate Psihologie
Referate Romana
Referate Romana1
Referate Spaniola
 


Comparison between the United States, United Kingdom and Romanian Constitutions and Legal System

... s no poer to remove them. The United States President can be judged hether he has, or not, acted constitutionally by the Supreme Court. If the Federal Judges consider that the presidents behaviour as indeed unconstitutional he may be impeached that is accusing him of a crime against the state. In Romania the parliament in a general reunion of the to Houses can decide, ith at least 23 of the votes, to place the president under the accusation of high treason. The final decision lies ith the High Court of Justice. A unique feature in the Romanian Legal System represents the Constitutional Court. Its main functions are to say hether or not a la confirms ith the Constitution, hether international agreements are from the Romanian Constitution point of vie constitutional, hether the Parliaments acts are according to the Constitution, it atches over the Presidential elections and confirms the result, decides hether a political party is or not constitutional, etc. The Constitutional Court is made up of nine judges, three named by the president, three by the House of Representatives and three by the Senate, all for a term of nine years. They chose from among them a Chairman for a term of three years. In the United States the Supreme Court has the poer to judge a la passed by the Congress or the President and decide hether it is according to the Constitution. In other ords it interprets and repeals a good many las passed by the Congress or the President by declaring them unconstitutionally. The United States system of Governing is a centralized one. Any of the 50 states in the Union may very ell be an independent state as far as the internal affairs are concerned. The National Government has no right to intervene in the internal affaire of one state. A crime hich is not marked as a national one ill be judged according to the la of the state in hich it had been committed. The Federal Government has in charge only the matters that concern all the states. For example the postal service, immigration, the army, the navy, the collection of customs, the creation and release of coins and paper money into circulation, other territories or dependences hich are not yet organized as states therefore not yet admitted in the Union, etc. This separation beteen poers is found only in America because only this country is a federation. Therefore there are 100 Federal Courts through out the country but final authority rests in the Supreme Court. It includes a Chef Justice and eight Associate Justices. As eve mentioned they are all appointed by the President, for life, and confirmed by the Senate. Under the Constitution the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and councils and in cases ere another state is party, in one ord all those cases hich concern the Federation as a hole. In all other cases coming ithin the Supreme Court jurisdiction is only appellate. In one ord the main function of the Supreme Court is to interpret the Constitution not modify it. The Supreme Court is made up of layers ho have long and successful experience before they ere appointed to the Court. Not all of them ere judges or layers in private life, but also senator, attorney general, teacher in a la school or even administrator of agency acting like a court. Besides the Supreme Court and State Courts there are also Courts of Appeal and District Courts. State judges hold office for ten years and they are usually elected or confirmed in office by elections. The Courts of Appeal are organized as to relive the Supreme Court of the pressure of the Appellate Cases. In general these courts act as the final appeal court for litigations not involving constitutional questions. The supreme Court considers in most cases that the decision of the Courts of Appeal are clear and ell grounded, therefore there is no need go deeper into the questions further. The District Courts hav ... Download


Adauga in favorite | Parteneri | Publicitate | Adauga referat | Contact